This is what you get when you hire a guy with absolutely no experience with anything, you get piss poor everything.
If you are unemployed now and you were stupid enough to vote for obama in 2008, you got what you asked for, change. I'm pretty sure unemployment and a horrible economy wasn't exactly the change you had in mind but you hired a guy with no track record.
Even with all the other things going on in the world, I'm sure obama is spending just as much time on the economy as ever, none.
We need to face reality here folks, until we get rid of this pretender to the throne, nothing is going to change. He has no clue what he is doing and he has surrounded himself with people who only know one thing, radical socialism, and that won't fix what is wrong with this Country or the rest of the world. Strong economic policies here will solve our problems and will also help make the economies of other countries stronger.
From FoxNews
President Obama's plan to shift focus to the economy after his party was punished in this month's midterm elections is being disrupted by foreign policy challenges that could further undermine the White House's economic message.
The escalating tensions between North and South Korea this past week culminated a postelection period that included two presidential trips abroad, discussions about America's future in Afghanistan and a debate in Washington over Senate ratification of a nuclear arms treaty with Russia.
The more time and energy Obama spends on dealing with a foreign crisis increases the risk that he'll be seen as giving short shrift to the public's top priority: finding jobs at home for Americans.
White House officials say the international focus hasn't diminished the amount of time Obama spends working on the economy. Aides acknowledge that events abroad can make it more difficult to spotlight Obama's economic message -- one of an economy on a slow but steady march toward recovery, and a president aware that his political future rests on his ability to speed that recovery.
For example, when Obama arrived at a Chrysler plant in Kokomo, Ind., last Tuesday to promote the revival of the U.S. auto industry in his first domestic trip since the Nov. 2 elections, attention had turned to how the White House would respond to North Korea's artillery attack against a South Korean island.
"You learn quickly as president that there are events that happen like North Korea that you have to address as they happen, not how you would plan for them to happen," White House chief spokesman Robert Gibbs said.
Obama aides say they see opportunities for the president's economic message to break through, starting with a bipartisan meeting with lawmakers this Tuesday. The top issue will be what to do about the Bush-era tax cuts set to expire at year's end. Obama also plans to take a few more domestic trips through the end of the year to discuss the economy.
White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer said he doesn't believe the public is looking for the president to take an all-or-nothing approach to the economy.
"The American people understand that we have both domestic and international issues that have to be dealt with," Pfeiffer said. "The public expects that's what he's doing."
The recent burst of activity on the foreign policy front comes after an election that saw international issues seldom discussed, and a year that saw Obama spend just three days abroad, having traveled to the Czech Republic and Afghanistan in April.
Ari Fleischer, who served as press secretary for President George W. Bush, said it's too soon to tell whether a November filled with foreign policy following an election focused on the economy will hurt the current administration. But he said the ease with which world events can trump an administration's agenda is "a vivid reminder of how much more complicated and multifaceted governing is than campaigning."
While incidents such as North Korea's attack on South Korea were out of the administration's control, some of the shift toward foreign policy has been of the White House's making, most notably Obama's 10-day, four-country trip to Asia. Officials hoped Obama could use his popularity abroad to improve his standing following his self-proclaimed "shellacking" in the vote this month.
Former presidents have used a similar playbook, in part because political opponents at home traditionally refrain from criticizing the commander in chief while he's representing the U.S. on foreign soil.
But Obama's trip to Asia produced mixed results at best. While he made progress toward the U.S. gaining a foothold in emerging economies such as India and Indonesia, he failed to secure a highly sought-after free trade agreement with South Korea and couldn't rally wide-ranging international support for action against China's currency manipulation.
Darrell West, vice president and director of governance studies at the Brookings Institution, said Obama could have better kept the focus on the U.S. economy when he was overseas if he had delivered on some of those objectives.
"It's OK to send the president abroad if he brings back agreements that are good for the U.S.," he said. "The president's problem was that he wasn't able to bring back the good news he had hoped."
The White House was more pleased with the results of the recent NATO summit in Portugal, where Obama was seen as playing a pivotal role in the alliance securing agreements on the Afghanistan war and missile defense. Obama also received overwhelming international support for Senate ratification of a new arms control treaty with Russia.
Yet that treaty has proved to be another example of foreign policy threatening to trump Obama's message on the economy. Despite the White House's insistence that the lame-duck session of Congress would focus on initiatives to help the recovery, much of the conversation in Washington now is about whether lawmakers will hand Obama a victory on an issue he says is vital to the future of the U.S. relationship with Russia.
